A postmortem for Spring Challenge 2020 (Codingame AI Contest)

This entry was posted on

  • Codingame
  • post-mortem

Every couple of weeks, there is a contest hosted by the folks at codingame.com. This time it was based on Pacman.

If you just want to look at my statistics for this contest, you can just scroll to the bottom but, then you would miss seeing all the things I did wrong. 😊

Spring Challenge 2020
Spring Challenge 2020


For the contest, you were in command of 2 to 5 pacs on a grid and the goal was to eat more pellets without getting killed by the end of the game. There was a fog of war and the attack mechanism was based on Rock, Paper, Scissors.

Like all other codingame contest, the game was turn-based, where each turn consisted of you reading the world state information from stdin and outputting your action to stdout. This would be repeated till either only 1 bot was alive or a fixed number of rounds had passed.

You also had a maximum of 50 ms to submit your action before you would timeout and die.

There were multiple leagues

  • Wood 2
  • Wood 1
  • Bronze
  • Silver
  • Gold
  • Legend

To pass each league, you need to beat the boss of that league. Everyone starts from Wood 2 and depending on how good their bot fares, they move to the higher leagues. Also, as you move to the higher leagues, extra rules might apply.

For this contest, I decided to use C#.

What Went Right

  • I had already participated in a previous contest at codingame which gave me a base to start from. For other postmortems click here.

  • Tools from previous contests:

    • CGSync: A google chrome plugin that allowed me to sync a local file to the web IDE. This allowed me to work in Visual Studio which made for much faster workflow. The plugin can be found here.

    • I had already built a utility program which allowed me to combine multiple files into a single c# file which codingame requires. This enabled me to split my code across different files while developing.

    • I had a python script to help download the game data, parse it and put it into a text file which would be consumed by my program. This allowed me to step through and debug the AI when I could see that my AI was failing to win because of some bug instead of just relying on the stderr stream.

    • I isolated the IO into a separate class and made it so that every time I was reading anything from stdin it was outputted to the error stream.

    • I had a few global constants which allowed me to do things like enabling/disabling logging with a single line change.

  • Using C#: It is much faster to write code in C# than C++, especially since its what I am primarily using in my day job.

  • Continuous refactoring enabled me to keep my code readable and isolated the areas that I had to work on.

  • Using Source Control: I cannot even stress how helpful it was to go back a version or two because the new logic was performing even worse than the one a few iterations before. This was especially true when I tried to switch to attack the opponent.

  • Iterative development: I was able to reach Silver just by concentrating on the movement rather than the pac types.

  • Precomputing the neighbour and visible cells in the 1st turn made it easier to calculate the move.

  • I was in the top 400 for some time.

What went wrong

  • I did not write any tests which made it difficult to have confidence that I was not breaking things as I was refactoring and modifying the algorithm. There were a few times where I introduced a bug after refactoring and did not realise till my rank dropped and I watched a replay.

  • I did not get to spend as much time as I would have liked on this. With work and other personal commitments, I was only able to spend a few hours on the problem. I was also unable to work on the weekend just before the contest ended which dropped my rank from the early 400’s to below 600 by the time I ended the contest.

  • I wanted to Livestream/record my development but I was not able to Livestream every time I worked on this. I could only Livestream early morning before starting work.

  • I was almost able to beat the Siver league Boss. In fact I was ranked 2 at some point in the league but I just couldn’t get that slight improvement to move to the Gold league.

  • Quite a few times, the tweaks that I made, made my bot perform worse. This was especially true in the Silver League.

What would I do differently

  • Since this was a game of partial information having an MCTS or even Negamax algorithm might have helped.

  • Rather than mixing the IO with the state, I should have kept 2 sepearte classes for the state and memory.

  • Precomputing all the paths in the 1st turn would have made it faster to tweak the algorithm

  • Adding a timer for profiling. Some of the tweaks I made resulted in timeouts which could have been optimized if I was profiling.

Other Notes

  • This was a fun contest but the fog of war and partial information was a little annoying.

  • If you want a copy of any of my tools, let me know on twitter and I can make it available.

  • It would be great if once the contest has ended, links could be provided to tutorials for the various AI techniques that were successful.

  • If you want to look at the commit history and get a sense of how I approached the contest you can find the code here.

  • If you are interested in watching me code parts of the contest you can find the playlist here.


League: Silver

Global Rank: 654/4955 (13%)

New Zealand: 6/20

India: 8/127

Feel free to follow me at codingame using this URL.

More like this

Ankur Sheel © 2021
Connect with me